Encyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities)


Product Description
No description availableEncyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities) Review
My first comment is a response to Mr. Noel Anderson. As a Women's Studies graduate student, I first must take issue with his assertion that graduate students, among others, are not qualified to contribute to a volume of this sort. With 6 years of training in feminist theory, I would personally consider myself competent to write a concise summary of an important author or term in this field; I'm sure my peers feel the same. Second, I think it's telling that Mr. Anderson is so upset that Simone de Beauvoir's relationship with Sartre is not a large part of the entry on this writer. Certainly, the indebtedness to existential thought is acknowledged in the entry, and since the encyclopedia is focused on contributions to feminist theory, I see no reason why de Beauvoir's personal relationships should receive the attention instead of her intellectual grounding. I also find it hard to imagine anyone being disturbed by an entry on Sartre for say, "An Encyclopedia of Philosophical Thought" that failed to mention de Beauvoir.Personally, I have found this reference volume invaluable for checking the history of sometimes ambiguous terms, not to mention useful as a bibliographic source. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report abuse | PermalinkComment CommentMost of the consumer Reviews tell that the "Encyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities)" are high quality item. You can read each testimony from consumers to find out cons and pros from Encyclopedia of Feminist Literary Theory (Garland Reference Library of the Humanities) ...

No comments:
Post a Comment