The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order


Product Description
In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus publicly defended his hypothesis that the earth is a planet and the sun a body resting near the center of a finite universe. But why did Copernicus make this bold proposal? And why did it matter? The Copernican Question reframes this pivotal moment in the history of science, centering the story on a conflict over the credibility of astrology that erupted in Italy just as Copernicus arrived in 1496. Copernicus engendered enormous resistance when he sought to protect astrology by reconstituting its astronomical foundations. Robert S. Westman shows that efforts to answer the astrological skeptics became a crucial unifying theme of the early modern scientific movement. His interpretation of this "long sixteenth century," from the 1490s to the 1610s, offers a new framework for understanding the great transformations in natural philosophy in the century that followed.The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order Review
After much delay in getting my hands on this book in Patagonia, the preface of Westman's book seduced me instantly. In the opening sentence of the preface he asks: "Under what conditions do people change or give up beliefs to which they are most deeply committed?" This is a fascinating question, although the most unsatisfying and prosaic answer happens to be the most accurate: when that person dies. Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) was well aware of this from his very limited observations, but Westman is driving at illuminating the process of transformation rather than at mere cessation.What strikes me as odd, is the author's focus on "origins", and his division of the book's material into two equal perspectives. First is a focus on "what was THE orginal question Copernicus was trying to answer" [my emphasis] and follow-up issues and unknowns relating to what question. The second, but not necessarily of lesser importance is "the KINDs of answers offered by Copernicus and those who followed him."
As described, attention may be drawn to use of "the question", which assumes there is a single, most important consideration which is unlike typical cognition. When we are thinking about anything non-trivial, we normally have reinforcing and conflicting networks of complex associations. C's development of the heliocentic model, and the decisions about communicating it were undoubtedly of this level of complexity.
I appreciate the author's diligence and determination to violate the well-meaning advice of friends, and pursue writing this book. As it contains fascinating historical information, e.g.: the association of C with Dominico Novara, this huge volume details the factors which seem perhaps most easily structured within the context illustrated in Creating Scientific Concepts (Bradford Books).
Most of the consumer Reviews tell that the "The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order" are high quality item. You can read each testimony from consumers to find out cons and pros from The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order ...
